<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube in China conundrum rears its head again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I know what you mean Charlie/Shan. But it does pain me to sign my name to unintelligble crap and then watch it float out across the wire. Although I hardly touch the diplomatic desk "stories" of course. I don't think people make a real distinction between a Xinhua journalist's story and a government story. So one stream of babble completely undermines hard work spent on a decent two-page dissection of the problems with the Chinese health service for example - and no one takes it seriously. For court stories - the verdict for the case of blind activist Chen Guangcheng for example - it is best to attribute every sentence to the court document. And add phrases like "no more deatils were given" etc. Disassociate Xinhua from it all, as well as myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what you mean Charlie/Shan. But it does pain me to sign my name to unintelligble crap and then watch it float out across the wire. Although I hardly touch the diplomatic desk &#8220;stories&#8221; of course. I don&#8217;t think people make a real distinction between a Xinhua journalist&#8217;s story and a government story. So one stream of babble completely undermines hard work spent on a decent two-page dissection of the problems with the Chinese health service for example - and no one takes it seriously. For court stories - the verdict for the case of blind activist Chen Guangcheng for example - it is best to attribute every sentence to the court document. And add phrases like &#8220;no more deatils were given&#8221; etc. Disassociate Xinhua from it all, as well as myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shan</title>
		<link>http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Shan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Agree with Charlie.

My personal policy when working on a govt-run "lifestyle" magazine in Beijing was to edit to native standard factual stories, and let our non-native "English Expert" (read: censor) handle the govt. stories. The result was always that the govt. stories stuck out like the sore thumbs they were.

Oh, and a nice mini-essay about "English Polishing" can be found here:

http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1672104</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Charlie.</p>
<p>My personal policy when working on a govt-run &#8220;lifestyle&#8221; magazine in Beijing was to edit to native standard factual stories, and let our non-native &#8220;English Expert&#8221; (read: censor) handle the govt. stories. The result was always that the govt. stories stuck out like the sore thumbs they were.</p>
<p>Oh, and a nice mini-essay about &#8220;English Polishing&#8221; can be found here:</p>
<p><a href="http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1672104" rel="nofollow">http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1672104</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,
Found you through the lovely Positive Solutions, but have today been directed here by thee eswn.
Congratualtions!
Like what I see so far. Keep up the good work.
Matt

ps This editing/polishing business must really bring out the best in people, if only after hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,<br />
Found you through the lovely Positive Solutions, but have today been directed here by thee eswn.<br />
Congratualtions!<br />
Like what I see so far. Keep up the good work.<br />
Matt</p>
<p>ps This editing/polishing business must really bring out the best in people, if only after hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 07:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>"YouTube-style websites were visited by about 76 million of the 137 million Chinese Internet users last year"
Wouldn't that be mostly the domestic clones like tudou though? Obviously haven't done a content comparison, but I suspect they may feature fewer clips of police murder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;YouTube-style websites were visited by about 76 million of the 137 million Chinese Internet users last year&#8221;<br />
Wouldn&#8217;t that be mostly the domestic clones like tudou though? Obviously haven&#8217;t done a content comparison, but I suspect they may feature fewer clips of police murder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 06:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>ESWN, slightly-tedious Danwei - you've made it now! May the idiotic comments commence...

Bit of State-media solidarity, brother: You got to disassociate, and make sure you keep errors like 'stowaway' in just to make sure the effect is for the story to be laughable...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESWN, slightly-tedious Danwei - you&#8217;ve made it now! May the idiotic comments commence&#8230;</p>
<p>Bit of State-media solidarity, brother: You got to disassociate, and make sure you keep errors like &#8217;stowaway&#8217; in just to make sure the effect is for the story to be laughable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 04:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Youtube is not entirely untouched by the GFW:

http://www.shanghaiexpat.com/index.php?name=MDForum&#38;file=viewtopic&#38;p=597318

&#62; I am wondering if anyone else has trouble getting to the second page of 
&#62; Youtube when searching for videos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube is not entirely untouched by the GFW:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.shanghaiexpat.com/index.php?name=MDForum&amp;file=viewtopic&amp;p=597318" rel="nofollow">http://www.shanghaiexpat.com/index.php?name=MDForum&amp;file=viewtopic&amp;p=597318</a></p>
<p>&gt; I am wondering if anyone else has trouble getting to the second page of<br />
&gt; Youtube when searching for videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>China Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 23:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beijingnewspeak.com/2007/03/14/youtube-in-china-conundrum-rears-its-head-again/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Congrats.  I think you are the only blog that views this talk/article for what it was.  Everyone else keeps acting as though new laws just came down or it is a matter of days before they do.  Let's wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats.  I think you are the only blog that views this talk/article for what it was.  Everyone else keeps acting as though new laws just came down or it is a matter of days before they do.  Let&#8217;s wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
